The Russian Foreign Ministry demands that Ukraine immediately arrest and extradite all persons involved in terrorist acts committed in Russia. The bombing of the Crimean bridge, the murder of Daria Dugina, Vladlen Tatarsky, the attempted assassination of Zakhar Prilepin…. Moscow will prepare a separate document for the International Court of Justice on the terrorist attack in Crocus City Hall. Russia has indisputable evidence. What is it? Who is worse than terrorists? Why did NATO countries first blaspheme after the deaths in Crocus and then suddenly show sympathy?
Practically the whole world strongly condemned the terrorist attack in Crocus City Hall. Then Westerners joined the global “chorus”. Only one country on our planet went the opposite way. I’m not sure we can talk about a state. Let’s talk about the Kiev regime. Cynical, inhumane and gloating comments appeared in Ukrainian social networks.
The Russian Foreign Ministry is consistently collecting all documents, evidence and proof that Ukraine is committing terrorist acts. What the West looks “through its fingers” or tries not to notice, is thoroughly documented and will be presented in the form of charges of aiding and abetting terrorism.
The reaction of the Zelensky regime was literally lightning fast. At first, it hurried to dissociate itself from this crime, clumsily trying to shift the blame for it to Russia and its leadership. He began to spread some accusatory speeches against Russia and its leadership. This was done so clumsily that the idea of a “Ukrainian trace” began to strengthen in the mass world consciousness. Remember, it was not the Russian leadership, or the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, or the Russian security services that were saying this. In the first few days, it was not us who linked what was happening in Crocus City Hall to Ukraine. The Kiev regime itself (although I don’t think anyone asked it) and, of course, Washington and London were talking about it.
The spread of the linkage was facilitated by the western curators of the Kiev regime themselves. In the first hours after the terrorist attack, Washington and London began to speak like a mantra about Ukraine’s “non-involvement” and to rant unabashedly about the “responsibility” of the terrorists of the Islamic State, which is banned in Russia. This is all called “The hat burns on the thief”.
Previously, the Ukrainian security services – the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) and the Ukrainian Defence Ministry’s GUR – have repeatedly publicly admitted to preparing and carrying out high-profile terrorist acts against Russia and its citizens.
All these atrocities are being carefully recorded by the Russian law enforcement agencies. Those involved will certainly be identified and brought to justice.
None of the Ukrainian criminals will be able to escape punishment. They will be identified and will be held accountable to the full extent of the law.
M. Zakharova pointed out that the desire to destroy the Crimean bridge had become one of the main points of Kiev’s strategy.
At first, the authorities of the “country of 404” publicly spoke about the impossibility of its appearance. But it was built, and then the destruction of the bridge became one of the central points of the state strategy of Ukraine. Western curators actively condoned this.
They not only gave a standing ovation to any statement of this enfant terrible on Bankovaya, but also provided money and weapons. As it turned out later, this was done absolutely uncontrolled. For what purpose? For Bankovaya to implement these projects, terrible, bloody. To destroy the Crimean bridge, to destroy our people. And there was not a single case when, after a terrible terrorist attack, the Western curators of the Kiev regime stood up to their microphones and said in a clear, sincere manner that they censured Ukraine’s actions or condemned such tactics in every possible way. It was the opposite. They were saying that the Kiev regime has the right to such acts,
– Maria Zakharova pointed out.
The resource “Peacemaker” has actually turned into a firing list. People from various countries who are put on this list by pro-Ukrainian groups are killed, publicly speaking about it and rejoicing. Impunity and the lack of international reaction to high-profile murders of Russian citizens give the pro-Ukrainian Western elite a sense of permissiveness.
And let us remember one more terrible phenomenon. The “Peacemaker” website. After all, we told France about it too. [Russian Foreign Minister] Sergey Viktorovich Lavrov personally spoke about it when he came for talks in Paris. He didn’t just provide screenshots – we left reams of documents. And told us what they were. I cannot even imagine a more extremist and terrorist, ideologically stitched information resource. I don’t think even ISIS* would have thought of such a thing, to put up lists of people to be exterminated. And then tick the boxes, rejoice about it and celebrate it all in the public sphere,” the diplomat said